The Book of RuthThe Little Biblical Book with Large Themes Talkback Add Your Comment
![]() Many of us are at least somewhat familiar with the story of Ruth, but we may not be aware that this short book contains many of the themes important to the Hebrew Bible as a whole. We’ve selected two articles that will help you deepen your appreciation of this beautiful Biblical tale. In “Ruth,” an article that originally appeared in Bible Review, Bible scholar Adele Berlin recounts the story of Ruth and shows how it interweaves issues of land and people, exile and return. In a second BR article, “Men Are from Judah, Women Are from Bethlehem,” Denise Dick Herr, a professor of English, uses bestselling contemporary books on the different communication styles of women and men as a springboard to examine the speech of the characters in Ruth; her close reading reveals that the men’s speech is concerned with control and power while that of the women focuses on relationships and love.
מַרְגַלוֹת and שָׁכַבMark, while the way in which anonymous makes his point is rather crass, the idea is not without merit. The two words above in the context of Ruth 3 are in fact the topic of much debate among scholars. Both words are used euphemistically in Scripture. One notable example of the euphemistic use of רֶגֶל (feet) is Exodus 4:25. שָׁכַב is used much more frequently than the above in a euphemistic manner. So to say that "...none is present" would be uninformed. Check out some commentaries on Ru.3. • • • • • • • re: Anonymous from EnglandI would like to point out that anonymous from England seems to have been misinformed about what he said. This was not a sexual thing, it was asking for physical protection and provision through marriage. It is only in our sick society that people can't help but read evil into things where none is present. • • • • • • • Ruth: Men and WomenWe see the world through lenses of our culture. The writer of this article, like the writers of the two books that he mentions influenced him, has fallen victim to a silly generalization spawned by being hostage to the North American over-emphasis on capitalist, individualistic, achievement-oriented and physical appearance values. Many North American men and women may indeed tend to be as the writers state. But they, thank heavens, are not representative of humanity past, present or future. • • • • • • • The Righteous RuthNo, Anonymous. Ruth's story is told to celebrate her as the ancestress of King David. As such, she would not be cast as an immoral woman. • • • • • • • Story of RuthA biblical treasure often neglected. The story of 3 widows, one of whom gives up home and family for the sake of righteousness. The pieces you offer on Ruth neglect the cultural context of the story in favor of modern interpretations. This is how NOT to understand the book. I'm speaking as a biblical anthropologist. • • • • • • • The book of RuthRuth is advised by her mother-in-law to wash and perfume and go to Boaz that night to lie 'at his feet'. That is Biblical euphemism for Boaz's genitals. Ruth did to Boaz what Monica Levinsky did to Clinton some 2,000 years later, but with a happier outcome. • • • • • • • the book of ruthImportant personal lessons: Elemelech, whose name means, GOD IS KING, must have had Godly parents. But in time of famine he does not live up to his name but retreats to an idolatrous country, bringing eventual disaster. Boaz, on the other hand,weathers the famine with God's people. Lesson: What I do in life can seriously affect others. A serious study of this little book can be a blessing to you - READ IT. • • • • • • • the book of ruthNo question, Ruth is a most important book in the OT writings. I have taught it often - there are so many practical lessons for us today since the setting of the story, "In the days when the Judges ruled" were days when "every man did that which was right in his own eyes. See further comment • • • • • • • RuthAdele Berlin's article on Ruth contains some acute insights into the meaning of this book. I think the point made about the remarkable incorporation of the foreigner (Ruth) into the life of her mother-in-laws community (Israel) finds support in William Dever's Who Were the Ancient Israelites and Where Did They Come From? published 2003 (after the original of Berlin's article). Dever makes a good case that the observed upsurge in population in the Judean highlands in the 12th century BCE is not evidence of a conquest, but represents an influx of the residents of Canaanite cities. After reading Dever's book it occurred to me that the real story behind the 12th century population boom for Israel is not in Joshua but in the book of Ruth. It is nice to see a hypothesis confirmed from two very disparate sources. • • • • • • • |
![]() The Biblical Archaeology Society is an educational non-profit 501c(3) organization. Make a tax-deductible gift today. BRAND NEWAncient Board Games February 11, 2013 The Nubian Pyramids of Sedeinga February 08, 2013 The Last Days of Hattusa February 08, 2013 Who Were the Essenes? February 07, 2013 Charles Fellows in Aphrodisias February 05, 2013 MOST POPULARHow Archaeology Illuminates the Bible Why Jesus Went Back to Galilee FREE BIBLE AND ARCHAEOLOGY ARTICLESWhere Is Sodom? The Case for Tall el-Hammam FIRST PERSON: What to Do with Unprovenanced Artifacts—Publish or Perish? BIBLICAL VIEWS: Images of Crucifixion: Fresh Evidence ARCHAEOLOGICAL VIEWS: Israelite Life Before the Kings THE BIBLE IN THE NEWS: Make No Bones About It SCHOLAR’S STUDYMore on the Mosaics December 12, 2012 Critical Biblical Scholarship—A Response October 10, 2012 BAR Authors Respond to Readers’ Letters October 10, 2012 Who Really Invented the Alphabet—Illiterate Miners or Educated Sophisticates? September 13, 2012 Three Takes on the Oldest Hebrew Inscription August 08, 2012 FREE Downloadable E-BooksJames, Brother of Jesus: The Forgery Trial of the Century ![]() |
INFORMATION |
PUBLICATIONS |
BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY SOCIETY NETWORK LINKS |