You’ll also receive the BAR Companion e-newsletter, containing the latest in Bible and archaeology news, exclusive features, contests and more.
We will notify you via email as soon as the judge hands down the trial verdict, and this free e-book can be released. In the interim, you’ll receive reports on the trial as they become available in our BAR Companion email newsletter.
In late December 2004, four Israelis and one Palestinian Arab were indicted in Jerusalem on charges of running a massive forgery ring over several decades. The Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) and the Israeli police claimed the ring had created a host of Biblically-related ancient artifacts with forged inscriptions involving millions of dollars, some of which are exhibited in the prestigious Israel Museum. The trial opened in September 2005 and continued for five years through 116 sessions, 133 witnesses, 200 exhibits, and close to 12,000 pages of testimony from witnesses.
In October 2010, closing arguments finally wrapped up in “the forgery trial of the century,” to determine whether or not the James Ossuary, the Yehoash tablet and other ancient artifacts were forged by two defendants. All that remains is for trial judge Aharon Farkash to pore through the evidence and deliver his verdict.
The judge will be deciding whether the case’s two remaining defendants, Tel Aviv collector Oded Golan and antiquities dealer and scholar Robert Deutsch, are guilty of creating and selling forged antiquities, most notably the now-famous first-century C.E. bone box (or ossuary) inscribed “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,” a small inscribed ivory pomegranate allegedly used in Solomon’s Temple, and the Yehoash tablet, which, if authentic, would be the first royal inscription of an Israelite king ever found.
The Allegedly Forged Antiquities: James Ossuary Inscription, Ivory Pomegranate Inscription, Jehoash Tablet Inscription
The inscriptions below will be considered forgeries in the public mind for at least a generation. Why? Because these inscriptions have been declared forgeries, supposedly unanimously, by two committees of the IAA, led by Tel Aviv University Professor and archaeologist Yuval Goren.
Among the ancient artifacts alleged in the 2004 indictment to be forgeries are the following:
James Ossuary Inscription
A limestone bone box (ossuary) inscribed “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus” is the most famous ancient artifact alleged to be a forgery. The ossuary was first published in Biblical Archaeology Review (on October 21, 2002) and the next day this ancient artifact was front-page news in the New York Times, the Washington Post and around the world.
The 2002 article in Biblical Archaeology Review announced:
Amazing as it may sound, a limestone bone box (called an “ossuary”) has surfaced in Israel that may once have contained the bones of James, the brother of Jesus. We know this because an extraordinary inscription incised on one side of the ossuary reads in clear Aramaic letters: “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus.”
But is this the same James who was the brother of Jesus of Nazareth, or was this another James, whose father happened to be called Joseph and who happened coincidentally also to have a brother named Jesus?
In the case of the James ossuary, there is a consensus that bone box itself is in fact a true ancient artifact. Only the inscription has been alleged to be a forgery.
Hershel Shanks explains why he believes the James Ossuary inscription is authentic in the free e-book James, Brother of Jesus: The Forgery Trial of the Century. Be among the first to receive this free e-book—immediately—when the trial verdict is handed down.
As an added benefit, we’ll send you an English translation of the verdict.
|